Theorem

For every natural number n1,

i=1ni=n(n+1)2.

This worked proof is a reference for the structure we expect on proof-based problem submissions: a clearly labeled base case, inductive hypothesis, and inductive step, with each algebraic move either self-evident or annotated.

Proof (by induction on n)

Let P(n) denote the statement

P(n):i=1ni=n(n+1)2.

We prove P(n) holds for all n with n1.

Base case: n=1

i=11i=1and1(1+1)2=22=1.

Both sides equal 1, so P(1) holds.

Inductive hypothesis

Fix an arbitrary k with k1 and assume P(k) holds -- that is,

i=1ki=k(k+1)2.(IH)

Inductive step: show P(k)P(k+1)

We must show

i=1k+1i=(k+1)((k+1)+1)2=(k+1)(k+2)2.

Starting from the left-hand side and peeling off the last term:

i=1k+1i=(i=1ki)+(k+1)(split last term)=k(k+1)2+(k+1)(by IH)=k(k+1)+2(k+1)2(common denominator)=(k+1)(k+2)2(factor (k+1)).

This is exactly the right-hand side of P(k+1), so P(k+1) holds.

Conclusion

We have shown P(1) directly and P(k)P(k+1) for every k1. By the principle of mathematical induction, P(n) holds for every n with n1.

Commentary

A complete proof by induction has four named pieces:

  1. Statement of P(n). Name the predicate you are proving so later references are unambiguous.
  2. Base case. Verify the smallest index explicitly -- do not hand-wave.
  3. Inductive hypothesis. State the assumption P(k) in full. Label it (e.g. (IH)) so the inductive step can cite it.
  4. Inductive step. Derive P(k+1) from P(k) with each step justified. Every equality should be either arithmetic or a cited identity / hypothesis.

A submission missing any of these pieces -- especially an unstated inductive hypothesis, or a base case that was assumed rather than verified -- is not a complete proof, even if the algebra in the middle is correct.