Theorem
For every natural number ,
This worked proof is a reference for the structure we expect on proof-based problem submissions: a clearly labeled base case, inductive hypothesis, and inductive step, with each algebraic move either self-evident or annotated.
Proof (by induction on )
Let denote the statement
We prove holds for all with .
Base case:
Both sides equal , so holds.
Inductive hypothesis
Fix an arbitrary with and assume holds -- that is,
Inductive step: show
We must show
Starting from the left-hand side and peeling off the last term:
This is exactly the right-hand side of , so holds.
Conclusion
We have shown directly and for every . By the principle of mathematical induction, holds for every with .
Commentary
A complete proof by induction has four named pieces:
- Statement of . Name the predicate you are proving so later references are unambiguous.
- Base case. Verify the smallest index explicitly -- do not hand-wave.
- Inductive hypothesis. State the assumption in full. Label it (e.g.
(IH)) so the inductive step can cite it. - Inductive step. Derive from with each step justified. Every equality should be either arithmetic or a cited identity / hypothesis.
A submission missing any of these pieces -- especially an unstated inductive hypothesis, or a base case that was assumed rather than verified -- is not a complete proof, even if the algebra in the middle is correct.